People often use the terms court reporter and stenographer interchangeably, but there are a few key differences that distinguish them from each other. If you’re going to hire a court reporter or a stenographer, you should know the difference between the two so you can make the best decision. Here’s an overview highlighting the biggest and most important differences between court reporters and stenographers. 

Explaining the Difference Between Court Reporters and Stenographers

Court reporters are distinguished from stenographers by their level of education. Someone can become a stenographer in roughly six months. On the other hand, court reporters typically undergo a number of years of training and education. 

It’s also customary for most court reporters to obtain certification in their field. The additional education that court reporters have under their belts allows them to perform more specialized tasks. 

Stenographers are generally limited to the singular task of providing transcriptions for the court. A court reporter can take on additional responsibilities ranging from administrative details to notary services. 

Court reporters are expected to have a more in-depth understanding of legal terminology and procedures. This also makes court reporters more valuable as they can accomplish more with the training they have. 

Training for 6 months to be a stenographer is a good way to start out if you want to test the waters and see if putting in a few years of schooling would be worth it. As a profession, being a court reporter takes a certain level of skill and dedication to the craft. 

You Can Find the Most Talented Court Reporters at CourtScribes

CourtScribes is proud to have a team of the most talented court reporters in the field. Our court reporters are in demand because they deliver unparalleled value in terms of speed, competency, accuracy, and professionalism. 

Find talented court reporters at CourtScribes, call today and ask about availability!